Now booking enterprise content platform builds for 2026. Reserve a slot
Most agencies sell speed, talent, or hype. We sell a delivery system that does not surprise you. The proof is a written set of commitments the client can point to in procurement, and two live platforms running on it: Ingersoll Rand's IRIS in China, and the Council of Europe Development Bank's events platform.
Scope is approved in writing by the right decision-maker, with a date, before delivery planning starts. Out-of-scope items are named explicitly. The thing the client thought was included but is not gets called out before the contract is signed.
Discovery puts an honest investment figure in front of the client before anyone quotes a number. A scope change after sign-off is a planning event, not a ticket edit, and its impact on date, budget, and dependencies is visible.
Every active task belongs to a version, milestone, sprint, or other visible plan. Implementation gets continuously checked against signed-off scope, so drift is caught early. Release readiness is based on evidence.
Important decisions are written down and accessible to both sides. A "no" is also a written decision. Rejected ideas do not silently come back six months later as new chaos.
Page types, reusable blocks, tenant configuration, and the relationships between them are nailed down before the first commit. On IRCO, that meant nine page types and tens of reusable blocks for 20+ brand tenants in China, modeled before the build, approved in writing, and implemented against acceptance criteria.
The model is the part that is hardest to change later. Discovery scales to the work. A small request might be one well-written ticket. A big one gets a workshop, a technical feasibility check, a UX exploration, and a full PRD.
Ingersoll Rand's frontend is a complex Next.js application, and IRIS 2.0 had been tightly coupled to Contentstack. Swapping one CMS for another would have solved the short-term migration while leaving the same architectural problem in a new form. The decision was to introduce a Content Provider Service inside IRIS, validated with Zod. Adapters were built for both Contentstack and Payload against that contract.
IRIS no longer needs to know whether a page came from Contentstack or Payload. A new adapter implements the same interface. That future-proofing was part of the architecture we sold and delivered.
Before delivery starts, we walk the client through how cooperation will work, what scope sign-off means, how new requests enter the plan, and what happens when scope changes. The cooperation model is written down and accessible to both sides later.
A dedicated discovery team sits on every inquiry from day one. We refuse to start building from a vague request. For every request we agree on the problem being solved, why it matters, who it affects, the expected outcome, the known constraints, the known risks, and what is still unclear.
Scope is approved in writing by the right decision-maker, with a date, before delivery planning starts. Out-of-scope items are named explicitly. Acceptance criteria are written before the first commit. A scope change after sign-off is a planning event, not an edit to a ticket.
Approved scope becomes a visible plan with tasks, owners, priorities, dependencies, risks, and a target delivery window. Technical review is part of planning, not something that surprises us during build. Active scope and future ideas live in different places.
Code is reviewed before it gets merged. QA is part of delivery, not a final check after coding is finished. Implementation gets continuously checked against signed-off scope. Release readiness is based on evidence, not optimism.
A release is a communication event, not only a deployment. The release outcome is verified after the deploy. Release notes spell out what was released, what changed for the user, what limitations remain, and what follow-up exists. Releases never introduce new scope.
Live projects do not decay into an unmanaged stream of urgent Slack messages. Defects, support requests, and new ideas are separated and routed differently. Support work does not silently consume the development capacity committed to planned scope.
IRCO shipped the Payload CMS platform before the Oracle Content Manager discontinuation deadline, on AWS China, with 24/7 monitoring. CEB sent hundreds of invitations for their 70-year anniversary with almost no support tickets on the invitation flow, and now use the platform for every new event they organise.
[Pending — a 30–50 word quote from a content platform client about the architecture decision, the editorial rollout, or the post-launch stewardship. The slot below holds attribution structure and is ready for sourcing before publication.]
Yes. Scope is approved in writing before development starts. Signed-off scope is fixed for the current cycle. Changes after sign-off require written approval and may affect timeline, cost, task breakdown, priorities, QA scope, and release plan.
It goes back through Discovery, unless it is an urgent production issue. The client helps prioritise new requests instead of treating everything as urgent. Developers do not absorb unclear scope by working overtime or guessing what the client meant.
We hold a top-tier formal partnership with Payload and ship the majority of enterprise platforms on it. Both IRCO and CEB run on Payload. Framer is the right answer for marketing surfaces where the client team needs to author visually; we hold the Framer Pro Enterprise Expert designation there.
Defects, support requests, and new ideas are separated and routed differently. Support work does not silently consume the development capacity committed to planned scope. The next cycle starts with Discovery and Sign-off, not with momentum.
The client participates in Discovery and scope definition, helps prioritise new requests, and approves scope in writing before development starts. Delayed client decisions, feedback, access, or approvals may delay delivery. Both sides see and sign off on the cooperation model before anyone writes code.
Thirty minutes on a call gives you a shape of the work and an honest investment figure. We will also tell you, on that same call, whether we are the right team for the work.